On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:17:59PM +0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 12:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> >
> >>>// Drops some small precision along the way but is simple..
> >>>static inline u64 cyclecounter_cyc2ns_128(const struc
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:32:03PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > You may want to also CC the maintainers of all the ARM subsystems that
> > > use read_persistent_clock and check with them to ensure this new
> > > interface will let
On 03/05/2013 12:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
// Drops some small precision along the way but is simple..
static inline u64 cyclecounter_cyc2ns_128(const struct cyclecounter *cc,
cycle_t cycle
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:53:02AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > // Drops some small precision along the way but is simple..
> > static inline u64 cyclecounter_cyc2ns_128(const struct cyclecounter *cc,
> > cycle_t cycles)
> > {
> > u64 max = U64_MAX/cc->
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the review and suggestions!
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:20:36PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:34:25AM +, Tang, Feng wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
> >
> > Sorry, I forgot to add you in cc list in the first place. Please
> > help to review the patch seri
5 matches
Mail list logo
