Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static

2018-02-21 Thread Fengguang Wu
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:51:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * kbuild test robot wrote: Fixes: 62d8b7fba8d3 ("x86/acpi: Add a new x86_init_acpi structure to x86_init_ops") Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu --- 0 files changed -ENOPATCH? Ah the script crashed when it tries to indent the new

Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static

2018-02-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Juergen Gross wrote: > On 21/02/18 09:51, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * kbuild test robot wrote: > > > >> > >> Fixes: 62d8b7fba8d3 ("x86/acpi: Add a new x86_init_acpi structure to > >> x86_init_ops") > >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > >> --- > >> 0 files changed > > > > -ENOPATCH? > > I

Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static

2018-02-21 Thread Juergen Gross
On 21/02/18 09:51, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * kbuild test robot wrote: > >> >> Fixes: 62d8b7fba8d3 ("x86/acpi: Add a new x86_init_acpi structure to >> x86_init_ops") >> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu >> --- >> 0 files changed > > -ENOPATCH? I'll send a patch to add "static" to the noop functions

Re: [RFC PATCH tip] x86/acpi: u64_x86_init_noop() can be static

2018-02-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* kbuild test robot wrote: > > Fixes: 62d8b7fba8d3 ("x86/acpi: Add a new x86_init_acpi structure to > x86_init_ops") > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > --- > 0 files changed -ENOPATCH? Thanks, Ingo