Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1 v2] vmscan: Support multiple kswapd threads per node

2018-04-10 Thread Buddy Lumpkin
> On Apr 6, 2018, at 12:38 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 05-04-18 23:25:14, Buddy Lumpkin wrote: >> >>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> >>> On Wed 04-04-18 21:49:54, Buddy Lumpkin wrote: v2: - Make update_kswapd_threads_node less racy - Handle locking

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1 v2] vmscan: Support multiple kswapd threads per node

2018-04-06 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 05-04-18 23:25:14, Buddy Lumpkin wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Wed 04-04-18 21:49:54, Buddy Lumpkin wrote: > >> v2: > >> - Make update_kswapd_threads_node less racy > >> - Handle locking for case where CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n > > > > Please do n

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1 v2] vmscan: Support multiple kswapd threads per node

2018-04-05 Thread Buddy Lumpkin
> On Apr 4, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 04-04-18 21:49:54, Buddy Lumpkin wrote: >> v2: >> - Make update_kswapd_threads_node less racy >> - Handle locking for case where CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n > > Please do not repost with such a small changes. It is much more > important

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1 v2] vmscan: Support multiple kswapd threads per node

2018-04-04 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 04-04-18 21:49:54, Buddy Lumpkin wrote: > v2: > - Make update_kswapd_threads_node less racy > - Handle locking for case where CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n Please do not repost with such a small changes. It is much more important to sort out the big picture first and only then deal with minor imp