Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-10 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 10-07-13 18:55:33, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:17:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Wed 10-07-13 09:31:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > [

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-10 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 10-07-13 18:55:33, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:17:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Wed 10-07-13 09:31:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > Which benchmark you are using for this testing? > > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-10 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:20:27AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > 于 2013/7/10 8:31, Joonsoo Kim 写道: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > On 07/03/2

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-10 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:17:03AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 10-07-13 09:31:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-10 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 10-07-13 09:31:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > > > On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > > > > On 07/03/20

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-09 Thread Zhang Yanfei
于 2013/7/10 8:31, Joonsoo Kim 写道: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal H

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-09 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > > On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > > > On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > >> On Wed 03-07-

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-04 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 04-07-13 13:24:50, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > > On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > >> On Wed 03-07-13 17:34:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > >> [...] > > >>> For one page alloca

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-03 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:01:43AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > > On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > >> On Wed 03-07-13 17:34:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > >> [...] > >>> For one page allocation at once, this patchset makes allocator slower than >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-03 Thread Zhang Yanfei
On 07/03/2013 11:51 PM, Zhang Yanfei wrote: > On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Wed 03-07-13 17:34:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> [...] >>> For one page allocation at once, this patchset makes allocator slower than >>> before (-5%). >> >> Slowing down the most used path is a no-go. Wher

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-03 Thread Zhang Yanfei
On 07/03/2013 11:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 03-07-13 17:34:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > [...] >> For one page allocation at once, this patchset makes allocator slower than >> before (-5%). > > Slowing down the most used path is a no-go. Where does this slow down > come from? I guess, it mig

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Support multiple pages allocation

2013-07-03 Thread Michal Hocko
On Wed 03-07-13 17:34:15, Joonsoo Kim wrote: [...] > For one page allocation at once, this patchset makes allocator slower than > before (-5%). Slowing down the most used path is a no-go. Where does this slow down come from? [...] -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send