Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched: Add a new API to find the prefer idlest cpu

2012-08-17 Thread Shirley Ma
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 18:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 08:39 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote: > > > Hello Ingo, Peter, > > Have you had chance to review below patch? > > Well no of course not, nobody CC'ed us.. > > Your patch submission sucks, you split the changelog an

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched: Add a new API to find the prefer idlest cpu

2012-08-17 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 08:39 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote: > Hello Ingo, Peter, > Have you had chance to review below patch? Well no of course not, nobody CC'ed us.. Your patch submission sucks, you split the changelog and the actual patch into two different emails. It doesn't mention who wou

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched: Add a new API to find the prefer idlest cpu

2012-08-17 Thread Shirley Ma
Hello Ingo, Peter, Have you had chance to review below patch? Thanks Shirley On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 23:57 -0700, Shirley Ma wrote: > Introduce a new API to choose per-cpu thread from cgroup control cpuset > (allowed) and preferred cpuset (local numa-node). > > The receiving cpus of a net