On 15/11/16 16:22, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> I'd go with the new error code. What about E2BIG or ENOSPC?
>>
>> I think the hypervisor should fill in the number of entries required
>> in this case.
>>
>> In case nobody objects I can post
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> I'd go with the new error code. What about E2BIG or ENOSPC?
>
> I think the hypervisor should fill in the number of entries required
> in this case.
>
> In case nobody objects I can post patches for this purpose (both Xen
> and Linu
>>> On 15.11.16 at 12:07, wrote:
> On 15/11/16 11:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.11.16 at 10:55, wrote:
>>> On 15/11/16 10:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 15.11.16 at 09:42, wrote:
> For a fully dynamical solution we'd need a way to get a partial
> E820 map from the hypervisor (e.g
On 15/11/16 11:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.11.16 at 10:55, wrote:
>> On 15/11/16 10:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.11.16 at 09:42, wrote:
For a fully dynamical solution we'd need a way to get a partial
E820 map from the hypervisor (e.g. first 128 entries) in order to
be
>>> On 15.11.16 at 10:55, wrote:
> On 15/11/16 10:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.11.16 at 09:42, wrote:
>>> For a fully dynamical solution we'd need a way to get a partial
>>> E820 map from the hypervisor (e.g. first 128 entries) in order to
>>> be able to setup at least some memory and later
On 15/11/16 10:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.11.16 at 09:42, wrote:
>> On 15/11/16 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.11.16 at 08:36, wrote:
On 15/11/16 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.11.16 at 07:33, wrote:
>> In case I'm right the Xen hypervisor should be prepared for
>>> On 15.11.16 at 09:42, wrote:
> On 15/11/16 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.11.16 at 08:36, wrote:
>>> On 15/11/16 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 15.11.16 at 07:33, wrote:
> In case I'm right the Xen hypervisor should be prepared for a larger
> e820 map, but this won't hel
On 15/11/16 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.11.16 at 08:36, wrote:
>> On 15/11/16 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 15.11.16 at 07:33, wrote:
On 15/11/16 01:11, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We're having problems with large systems hitting a BUG in
> xen_mem
>>> On 15.11.16 at 08:36, wrote:
> On 15/11/16 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.11.16 at 07:33, wrote:
>>> On 15/11/16 01:11, Alex Thorlton wrote:
Hey everyone,
We're having problems with large systems hitting a BUG in
xen_memory_setup, due to extra e820 entries created i
On 15/11/16 08:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.11.16 at 07:33, wrote:
>> On 15/11/16 01:11, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> We're having problems with large systems hitting a BUG in
>>> xen_memory_setup, due to extra e820 entries created in the
>>> XENMEM_machine_memory_map callba
>>> On 15.11.16 at 07:33, wrote:
> On 15/11/16 01:11, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> We're having problems with large systems hitting a BUG in
>> xen_memory_setup, due to extra e820 entries created in the
>> XENMEM_machine_memory_map callback. The change in the patch gets things
>>
On 15/11/16 01:11, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> We're having problems with large systems hitting a BUG in
> xen_memory_setup, due to extra e820 entries created in the
> XENMEM_machine_memory_map callback. The change in the patch gets things
> working, but Boris and I wanted to get opi
12 matches
Mail list logo
