On 12/18/2013 10:08 AM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>>
>>> The flow
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>> Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
>>> it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
>>> plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
>> Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun: Adde
>> Yes , in it's current state it's broken. But maybe we can try to fix
>> it instead of arbitrarily removing it. Please see my patches on
>> plumbing RFS into tuntap which may start to make it useful.
> Do you mean you patch [5/5] tun: Added support for RFS on tun flows?
> Sorry, can you say with
HI, Tom,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
>>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> > On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it u
On 12/17/2013 05:13 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>>> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>> >>
>>> >> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>>> >> growth issues and DoS attacks, so t
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>>
>> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
>> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
>> the tuntap driver, and
On 12/17/2013 03:26 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow control.
NACK.
T
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 23:47 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
> Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
> > From: Zhi Yong Wu
> >
> > The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> > growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it f
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:26:22 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> From: Zhi Yong Wu
>
> The flow cache is an extremely broken concept, and it usually brings up
> growth issues and DoS attacks, so this patch is trying to remove it from
> the tuntap driver, and insteadly use a simpler way for its flow cont
11 matches
Mail list logo
