Re: [RFC PATCH] mfd: syscon: add child device support

2014-10-30 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 17.06.2014, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lee Jones: > FAO DT chaps, > > I'd be interested to hear your opinion about this. any thoughts on this? With the MediaTek Reset Controller series (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/29/1008) another possible use case for this feature came just up.

Re: [RFC PATCH] mfd: syscon: add child device support

2014-06-23 Thread Philipp Zabel
Hi Rob, Am Dienstag, den 17.06.2014, 11:57 -0500 schrieb Rob Herring: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > For devices which have a complete register for themselves, it is possible to > > place them next to the syscon device with overlapping reg ranges. The same > > is >

Re: [RFC PATCH] mfd: syscon: add child device support

2014-06-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: > For devices which have a complete register for themselves, it is possible to > place them next to the syscon device with overlapping reg ranges. The same is We want to avoid overlapping ranges. > not possible for devices which only occupy b

Re: [RFC PATCH] mfd: syscon: add child device support

2014-06-17 Thread Lee Jones
FAO DT chaps, I'd be interested to hear your opinion about this. > For devices which have a complete register for themselves, it is possible to > place them next to the syscon device with overlapping reg ranges. The same is > not possible for devices which only occupy bitfields in registers share