Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 05-12-16 15:43:59, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 05-12-16 15:21:37, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 a

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 05-12-16 15:21:37, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > O

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 05-12-16 15:21:37, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 a

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > F

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > > > > > Currently if a patch should aim a st

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > > > Currently if a patch should aim a stable tree backport one should add > > > > > > Cc: st

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:24:00PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 05-12-16 14:15:57, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > That's not a problem in that I know I like to see them to give me a > > > > "heads up" that so

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 05-12-16 14:15:57, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > That's not a problem in that I know I like to see them to give me a > > > "heads up" that something is coming down the pipeline soon. > > > > Are you really tracking

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Michal, On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > That's not a problem in that I know I like to see them to give me a > > "heads up" that something is coming down the pipeline soon. > > Are you really tracking all those discussion to catch resulting patches > in the Lin

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Michal Hocko
On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > Currently if a patch should aim a stable tree backport one should add > > > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # $version > > > > to the s-o-b block. This has two ma

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

2016-12-05 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > Currently if a patch should aim a stable tree backport one should add > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # $version > > to the s-o-b block. This has two major disadvantages a) it spams the > stable mailing list w