On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:18:43PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
> applied blindly by people running checkpatch and fixing its warnings.
> Sometimes it's better to violate the 80-character "limit" in the name of
> readability, and
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:38:20PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:34 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:28:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:18 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 14:33 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:23 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> > > I've seen far more examples of the 80-column limit making code less
> > > readable rather than more. It's only rea
Josh Triplett writes:
> The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
> applied blindly by people running checkpatch and fixing its warnings.
> Sometimes it's better to violate the 80-character "limit" in the name of
> readability, and when it isn't, it's often better to re
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 22:23 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > I've seen far more examples of the 80-column limit making code less
> > readable rather than more. It's only really helpful when it forces code
> > restructuring, *not* when it
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I've seen far more examples of the 80-column limit making code less
> readable rather than more. It's only really helpful when it forces code
> restructuring, *not* when it just forces an arbitrary line break.
So teach that piece o
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
> applied blindly by people running checkpatch and fixing its warnings.
> Sometimes it's better to violate the 80-character "limit" in the name of
> readability, and when it
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:34 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:28:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:18 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
> > > applied blindly by people running check
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:28:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:18 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
> > applied blindly by people running checkpatch and fixing its warnings.
> > Sometimes it's better to viol
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:18 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The 80-character limit is not a hard-and-fast rule, nor should it be
> applied blindly by people running checkpatch and fixing its warnings.
> Sometimes it's better to violate the 80-character "limit" in the name of
> readability, and when i
10 matches
Mail list logo
