On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:03:03AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20 2020 at 17:42, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > so tglx hates this clearcpuid= interface where you have to give the
> > X86_FEATURE array indices in order to disable a feature bit for testing.
> > Below is a fir
On Sun, Sep 20 2020 at 17:42, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so tglx hates this clearcpuid= interface where you have to give the
> X86_FEATURE array indices in order to disable a feature bit for testing.
> Below is a first attempt (lightly tested in a VM only) to accept the bit
> names from /proc
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 02:35:27PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Thanks. Maybe also mention in the documentation that names can now be
> used.
Already did it as an incremental ontop. Will merge later:
---
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
b/Documentation/admin-guide/ke
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 07:29:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > Allowing 13:24 as input would be icing on the cake :)
>
> Well, I'm kinda "meh" on that. Why, you ask?
>
> Well, whether the user multiplies two integers or the ke
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:16:28PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> Allowing 13:24 as input would be icing on the cake :)
Well, I'm kinda "meh" on that. Why, you ask?
Well, whether the user multiplies two integers or the kernel does it for
her/him, I'd prefer the user.
But that's not even the probl
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 05:42:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so tglx hates this clearcpuid= interface where you have to give the
> X86_FEATURE array indices in order to disable a feature bit for testing.
> Below is a first attempt (lightly tested in a VM only) to accept the bit
> nam
6 matches
Mail list logo
