On Fri 17-04-15 16:44:16, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> >> system-wide event notifications to provide file
> >> systems with a common way of reportin
Hi,
On 04/18/2015 12:44 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
>>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>>> systems with a common way of reporting
On Apr 17, 2015, at 5:31 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
>> issues as they emerge.
>>
>> The notif
On Apr 17, 2015, at 11:37 AM, John Spray wrote:
> On 17/04/2015 17:22, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Fri 17-04-15 17:08:10, John Spray wrote:
>>> On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> In that case I'm confused -- why would ENOSPC be an appropriate use
>>> of this interface if the mount being entirely b
On 17/04/2015 17:22, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 17-04-15 17:08:10, John Spray wrote:
On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
In that case I'm confused -- why would ENOSPC be an appropriate use
of this interface if the mount being entirely blocked would be
inappropriate? Isn't being unable to service
On Fri 17-04-15 12:29:07, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-04-17 12:22, Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Fri 17-04-15 17:08:10, John Spray wrote:
> >>
> >>On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
> >>>On Fri 17-04-15 15:51:14, John Spray wrote:
> On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>
> >>
On 2015-04-17 12:22, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 17-04-15 17:08:10, John Spray wrote:
On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 17-04-15 15:51:14, John Spray wrote:
On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
For some filesystems, it may make sense to differentiate between a
generic warnin
On Fri 17-04-15 17:08:10, John Spray wrote:
>
> On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Fri 17-04-15 15:51:14, John Spray wrote:
> >>On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >>
> >>>For some filesystems, it may make sense to differentiate between a
> >>>generic warning and an error. F
On 04/17/2015 06:08 PM, John Spray wrote:
>
> On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Fri 17-04-15 15:51:14, John Spray wrote:
>>> On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>>
For some filesystems, it may make sense to differentiate between a
generic warning and an error. For
On 17/04/2015 16:43, Jan Kara wrote:
On Fri 17-04-15 15:51:14, John Spray wrote:
On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
For some filesystems, it may make sense to differentiate between a
generic warning and an error. For BTRFS and ZFS for example, if
there is a csum error on a block
On Fri 17-04-15 15:51:14, John Spray wrote:
> On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >On 2015-04-17 09:04, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >>On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> >>>On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >>>...
> +static const match_table_t fs_etypes = {
> >
On 17/04/2015 14:23, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-04-17 09:04, Beata Michalska wrote:
On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
...
+static const match_table_t fs_etypes = {
+{ FS_EVENT_INFO,"info" },
+{ FS_EVENT_WARN,"warn"
On Fri 17-04-15 09:23:35, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-04-17 09:04, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> >>On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >>...
> >>>+static const match_table_t fs_etypes = {
> >>>+ { FS_EVENT_INFO,"info" },
> >>>+ {
On 2015-04-17 09:04, Beata Michalska wrote:
On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
...
+static const match_table_t fs_etypes = {
+ { FS_EVENT_INFO,"info" },
+ { FS_EVENT_WARN,"warn" },
+ { FS_EVENT_THRESH, "thr" },
On Fri 17-04-15 15:04:37, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > Also I think that we should make it clear that each event type has
> > different set of arguments. For threshold events they'll be L1 & L2, for
> > oth
On 04/17/2015 03:04 PM, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
>>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>>> systems with a common way of reporting any poten
On 04/17/2015 01:31 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
>> issues as they emerge.
>>
>> The notification
On Thu 16-04-15 23:56:11, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 15.04.2015 09:15, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> > system-wide event notifications to provide file
> > systems with a common way of reporting any potential
> > issues as they emerge.
> >
> > T
On Wed 15-04-15 09:15:44, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> system-wide event notifications to provide file
> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
> issues as they emerge.
>
> The notifications are to be issued through generic
> netlink in
Hi,
On 04/16/2015 11:56 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 15.04.2015 09:15, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
>> issues as they emerge.
>>
>> The
Hi,
On 04/16/2015 10:10 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> On 04/16/2015 05:46 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 4/15/15 2:15 AM, Beata Michalska wrote:
Introduce configurable generic interface for file
system-wide event notifications to provide file
>>
On Thu 16-04-15 10:22:45, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On 04/15/2015 09:25 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 09:15:44AM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >
> >> +#define FS_THRESH_LR_REACHED 0x0020 /* The lower range of
> >> threshold has been reached */
> >> +#define
On 15.04.2015 09:15, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> system-wide event notifications to provide file
> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
> issues as they emerge.
>
> The notifications are to be issued through generic
> netlink interfa
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Beata Michalska wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 05:46 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 4/15/15 2:15 AM, Beata Michalska wrote:
> >> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> >> system-wide event notifications to provide file
> >> systems with a common way of reporting any potent
On 04/16/2015 05:46 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/15/15 2:15 AM, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
>> issues as they emerge.
>>
>> The notifications
On 04/15/2015 09:25 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 09:15:44AM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
>> system-wide event notifications to provide file
>> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
>> issues as they emerge.
On 4/15/15 2:15 AM, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> system-wide event notifications to provide file
> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
> issues as they emerge.
>
> The notifications are to be issued through generic
> netlink interfac
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 09:15:44AM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Introduce configurable generic interface for file
> system-wide event notifications to provide file
> systems with a common way of reporting any potential
> issues as they emerge.
>
> The notifications are to be issued through gene
28 matches
Mail list logo
