On 2016-06-18 10:45, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
On 2016-06-14 15:03, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
I don't like the idea of this patchset.
All limitations are context dependent and that context changes rapidly.
You'll never dump e
On 06/18/16 14:45, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
>> On 2016-06-14 15:03, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't like the idea of this patchset.
>>>
>>> All limitations are context dependent and that context changes rapidly.
>>>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2016-06-14 15:03, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>
>> I don't like the idea of this patchset.
>>
>> All limitations are context dependent and that context changes rapidly.
>> You'll never dump enough information for predicting future
On 2016-06-14 15:03, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
I don't like the idea of this patchset.
All limitations are context dependent and that context changes rapidly.
You'll never dump enough information for predicting future errors or
investigating reson of errors in past. You could try to reproduce
On 06/14/16 19:03, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> I don't like the idea of this patchset.
>
> All limitations are context dependent and that context changes rapidly.
> You'll never dump enough information for predicting future errors or
> investigating reson of errors in past. You could try to rep
I don't like the idea of this patchset.
All limitations are context dependent and that context changes rapidly.
You'll never dump enough information for predicting future errors or
investigating reson of errors in past. You could try to reproduce all
kernel logic but model always will be aproximat
6 matches
Mail list logo
