Re: [RFC 00/11] make try_to_unmap simple

2017-03-03 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 03/03/2017 07:41 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Anshuman, > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:52:27PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 03/02/2017 12:09 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: >>> Currently, try_to_unmap returns various return value(SWAP_SUCCESS, >>> SWAP_FAIL, SWAP_AGAIN, SWAP_DIRTY and SWAP_MLOCK

Re: [RFC 00/11] make try_to_unmap simple

2017-03-02 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Anshuman, On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:52:27PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 03/02/2017 12:09 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Currently, try_to_unmap returns various return value(SWAP_SUCCESS, > > SWAP_FAIL, SWAP_AGAIN, SWAP_DIRTY and SWAP_MLOCK). When I look into > > that, it's unncessary comp

Re: [RFC 00/11] make try_to_unmap simple

2017-03-02 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 03/02/2017 12:09 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Currently, try_to_unmap returns various return value(SWAP_SUCCESS, > SWAP_FAIL, SWAP_AGAIN, SWAP_DIRTY and SWAP_MLOCK). When I look into > that, it's unncessary complicated so this patch aims for cleaning > it up. Change ttu to boolean function so we can