On 2014/04/25 13:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25 April 2014 06:01, Daniel Sangorrin
> wrote:
>>
I can't keep it as a separate patch and so would be required to merge
it into my original patch..
>>>
>>> And the reason being: "No patch is supposed to break things, otherwise
>>> git bise
On 25 April 2014 06:01, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
>
>>> I can't keep it as a separate patch and so would be required to merge
>>> it into my original patch..
>>
>> And the reason being: "No patch is supposed to break things, otherwise
>> git bisect wouldn't work smoothly".. And so git bisect would c
>> I can't keep it as a separate patch and so would be required to merge
>> it into my original patch..
>
> And the reason being: "No patch is supposed to break things, otherwise
> git bisect wouldn't work smoothly".. And so git bisect would complain
> this issue after my patch and so I have to m
On 24 April 2014 14:54, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> Why didn't you just apply the patch on top of your tree so that the
> information included in the git commit (e.g: my name and mail) remains?
>
> This part:
>
> cpuset: quiesce: change irq disable/enable by irq save/restore
>
> The function __migra
On 2014/04/24 17:41, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 April 2014 14:01, Daniel Sangorrin
> wrote:
>> In kernel/cpuset.c:quiesce_cpuset() you are using the function
>> 'smp_call_function_any' which asks CPU cores in 'cpumask' to
>> execute the functions 'hrtimer_quiesce_cpu' and 'timer_quiesce_cpu'.
>>
On 24 April 2014 14:01, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> In kernel/cpuset.c:quiesce_cpuset() you are using the function
> 'smp_call_function_any' which asks CPU cores in 'cpumask' to
> execute the functions 'hrtimer_quiesce_cpu' and 'timer_quiesce_cpu'.
>
> In the case above, 'cpumask' corresponds to cor
On 2014/04/24 16:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 April 2014 12:55, Daniel Sangorrin
> wrote:
>> I tried your set of patches for isolating particular CPU cores from unpinned
>> timers. On x86_64 they were working fine, however I found out that on ARM
>> they would fail under the following test:
>
Dear Viresh Kumar,
I tried your set of patches for isolating particular CPU cores from unpinned
timers. On x86_64 they were working fine, however I found out that on ARM
they would fail under the following test:
# mount -t cpuset none /cpuset
# cd /cpuset
# mkdir rt
# cd rt
# echo 1 > cpus
# echo
On 24 April 2014 12:55, Daniel Sangorrin wrote:
> I tried your set of patches for isolating particular CPU cores from unpinned
> timers. On x86_64 they were working fine, however I found out that on ARM
> they would fail under the following test:
I am happy that these drew attention from somebody
9 matches
Mail list logo
