On Tue 23-07-13 10:44:08, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 23-07-13 09:53:34, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > The nmi one is disabled and then reinitialized from scratch. This
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 23-07-13 09:53:34, Don Zickus wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > The nmi one is disabled and then reinitialized from scratch. This
> > > has an unpleasant side effect that the allocati
On Tue 23-07-13 09:53:34, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > The nmi one is disabled and then reinitialized from scratch. This
> > has an unpleasant side effect that the allocation of the new event might
> > fail theoretically so the hard lockup de
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:32:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> The nmi one is disabled and then reinitialized from scratch. This
> has an unpleasant side effect that the allocation of the new event might
> fail theoretically so the hard lockup detector would be disabled for
> such cpus. On the oth
4 matches
Mail list logo
