On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:40:20AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> This is the basic interpretation I assumed, and most of what the tty core
> already did.
Yes, I know. :-)
So it's been a long time since I've had anything to do with the tty
code, but FWIW, I'd agree with merging Peter's patch.
On 09/11/2014 09:56 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:45:01PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> I'm all for working around broken hardware in the kernel, but this seems
>>> like a very old issue, if it's even one at all, that we would be
>>> changing for no one who has reported it
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:45:01PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > I'm all for working around broken hardware in the kernel, but this seems
> > like a very old issue, if it's even one at all, that we would be
> > changing for no one who has reported it (that I know of...)
>
> How to unwedge a termi
On 09/11/2014 06:19 AM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> It's not common knowledge (and its certainly counterintuitive) that
>> turning off output when output is already turned off (ie., tcflow(TCOOFF))
>> is the required trickery to unwedge a terminal.
>>
>> Unwedging directly seems the straightforwa
> It's not common knowledge (and its certainly counterintuitive) that
> turning off output when output is already turned off (ie., tcflow(TCOOFF))
> is the required trickery to unwedge a terminal.
>
> Unwedging directly seems the straightforward approach.
Putting the off/on in the man page might
On 09/10/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:11:14PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 09/10/2014 08:03 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
This patch changes user-space behavior (for the better) but I
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:11:14PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 09/10/2014 08:03 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> This patch changes user-space behavior (for the better) but I'm not sure
> >> that it's consequence-free. Also, it
On 09/10/2014 08:03 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> This patch changes user-space behavior (for the better) but I'm not sure
>> that it's consequence-free. Also, it might not be enough to unwedge the
>> terminal if the driver got its
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:28:19PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> This patch changes user-space behavior (for the better) but I'm not sure
> that it's consequence-free. Also, it might not be enough to unwedge the
> terminal if the driver got its own flow control state mangled.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ---
9 matches
Mail list logo
