Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> Around Tue 02 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300 or thereabout, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt >>> wrote: Around

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Around Tue 02 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300 or thereabout, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt >> wrote: >>> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Nore

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Tue 02 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300 or thereabout, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren >> Egtvedt wrote: >>> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabou

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-02 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren > Egtvedt wrote: >> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Nore

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-05-01 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt >> wrote: >> Is this still planned for 4.12? > > Yes, I hav

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-27 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, >> and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, i

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-27 Thread Boris Brezillon
Hi Hans, On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swift

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-06 Thread Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Around Sun 05 Mar 2017 21:58:16 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> I have prepared three patches in my for-linus branch in git tree >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/egtvedt/linux-avr32.git > > Ac

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-05 Thread Håvard Skinnemoen
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > I have prepared three patches in my for-linus branch in git tree > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/egtvedt/linux-avr32.git Acked-by: Haavard Skinnemoen Thank you for keeping it alive for so long! I looked throu

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-02 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Le 01/03/2017 à 21:44, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt a écrit : > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. It will definit

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-01 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. Thank

Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

2017-03-01 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote: > Hello all, > > The AVR32 architecture is not keeping up with the development of the kernel, > and since it shares so much of the drivers with Atmel ARM SoC, it is starting > to hinder these drivers to develop swiftly. > > Also,