On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:49:30AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 4:50 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:11:23PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 4:22 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:05:17PM -0600, Rob
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 4:50 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:11:23PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 4:22 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:05:17PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > x86 and arm64 can both support direct access of ev
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:50:27PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> if it works for all events, which I'm not sure of
That's what we have cap_user_rdpmc for.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:11:23PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 4:22 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:05:17PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > x86 and arm64 can both support direct access of event counters in
> > > userspace. The access sequence is less t
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:05:17PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> x86 and arm64 can both support direct access of event counters in
> userspace. The access sequence is less than trivial and currently exists
> in perf test code (tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c) with copies in
> projects such as PAPI
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 4:22 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:05:17PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > x86 and arm64 can both support direct access of event counters in
> > userspace. The access sequence is less than trivial and currently exists
> > in perf test code (tools/perf/arch
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:05:17PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> x86 and arm64 can both support direct access of event counters in
> userspace. The access sequence is less than trivial and currently exists
> in perf test code (tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/rdpmc.c) with copies in
> projects such as PAPI
7 matches
Mail list logo