On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 19:17 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 02:42 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
> > the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
> > has no remaining links, of course). Howeve
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 02:42 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
> the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
> has no remaining links, of course). However, there's one case where that
> does *not* happen. Name
Hey Al,
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:42:38AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
> the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
> has no remaining links, of course). However, there's one case where that
> does *no
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:42:38AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Normally opening a file, unlinking it and then closing will have
> the inode freed upon close() (provided that it's not otherwise busy and
> has no remaining links, of course). However, there's one case where that
> does *not* happen
4 matches
Mail list logo
