Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] AES assembler implementation for x86_64

2005-04-18 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:34:59PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > > OTOH, if _exactly the same file_ exist in i384 arch, then > > you should not duplicate it at all. Find a way to use one file > > for both arches. I haven't looked at the patches yet, but if it were pos

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] AES assembler implementation for x86_64

2005-04-18 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2005 12:01, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > >>Denis Vlasenko wrote: >> >>>On Sunday 17 April 2005 22:20, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: >>> >>> The attached patch contains Gladman's in-kernel code for key schedule and table generation modified to fit to my a

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] AES assembler implementation for x86_64

2005-04-18 Thread Denis Vlasenko
On Monday 18 April 2005 12:01, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > On Sunday 17 April 2005 22:20, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > > > >>The attached patch contains Gladman's in-kernel code for key schedule > >>and table generation modified to fit to my assembler implementation, > >>--

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] AES assembler implementation for x86_64

2005-04-18 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Sunday 17 April 2005 22:20, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > >>The attached patch contains Gladman's in-kernel code for key schedule >>and table generation modified to fit to my assembler implementation, >>-- >>Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use [EMAIL PROTE