On Mon 2014-11-10 12:37:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:53:30 +0100
> Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > > +/*
> > > + * How much buffer is left on the seq_buf?
> > > + */
> > > +static inline unsigned int
> > > +seq_buf_buffer_left(struct seq_buf *s)
> > > +{
> > > + return (s->size - 1
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:53:30 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * How much buffer is left on the seq_buf?
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +seq_buf_buffer_left(struct seq_buf *s)
> > +{
> > + return (s->size - 1) - s->len;
>
> This should be
>
> if (seq_buf_has_overflowe
On Fri 2014-11-07 13:30:17, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> I'm not going to waist bandwidth reposting the entire series. Here's a
> new version of this patch. I'm getting ready to pull it into my next
> queue.
>
> -- Steve
>
> From 11674c8df0580a03a2517e3a8e4705c47c663564 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> F
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:59:27 -0800
Joe Perches wrote:
> > Create a seq_buf layer that trace_seq sits on. The seq_buf will not
> > be limited to page size. This will allow other usages of seq_buf
> > instead of a hard set PAGE_SIZE one that trace_seq has.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 13:30 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I'm not going to waist bandwidth reposting the entire series. Here's a
> new version of this patch. I'm getting ready to pull it into my next
> queue.
All this seems sensible enough though I think it'd
be nicer if all the touch-ups were co
I'm not going to waist bandwidth reposting the entire series. Here's a
new version of this patch. I'm getting ready to pull it into my next
queue.
-- Steve
>From 11674c8df0580a03a2517e3a8e4705c47c663564 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:54:42 -0
On Wed 2014-11-05 16:21:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:17:20 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:00:07 -0500
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:41:47 -0500
> > > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > >
On Wed 2014-11-05 13:41:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:22:22 +0100
> Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > On Tue 2014-11-04 10:52:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> > Also I would add an explanation of the overall logic. If I get it
> > correctly from the c
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:17:20 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:00:07 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:41:47 -0500
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +int seq_buf_bitmask(struct seq_buf *s, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > >
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:00:07 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:41:47 -0500
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > + */
> > > > +int seq_buf_bitmask(struct seq_buf *s, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > > > + int nmaskbits)
> > > > +{
> > > > + unsigned in
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:41:47 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > > + */
> > > +int seq_buf_bitmask(struct seq_buf *s, const unsigned long *maskp,
> > > + int nmaskbits)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int len = SEQ_BUF_LEFT(s);
> > >
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + WARN_ON(s->size == 0);
>
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:26:20 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> > index ..97872154d51c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_SEQ_BUF_H
> > +#define _LINUX_SEQ_BUF_H
> > +
> > +#include
> > +
> > +#include
>
> One more small thing. We d
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:22:22 +0100
Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2014-11-04 10:52:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
> > Create a seq_buf layer that trace_seq sits on. The seq_buf will not
> > be limited to page size. This will allow other usages of seq_buf
> > inst
On Tue 2014-11-04 10:52:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> Create a seq_buf layer that trace_seq sits on. The seq_buf will not
> be limited to page size. This will allow other usages of seq_buf
> instead of a hard set PAGE_SIZE one that trace_seq has.
>
> Signed-off
On Tue 2014-11-04 10:52:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> Create a seq_buf layer that trace_seq sits on. The seq_buf will not
> be limited to page size. This will allow other usages of seq_buf
> instead of a hard set PAGE_SIZE one that trace_seq has.
>
> Signed-off
15 matches
Mail list logo
