On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>> As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
>> don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 03:01:30PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The
>
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
> don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The
existing code was done this way in order to make sure that the interrupt
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> As suggested by William, free the actual pages in a batch so that we
> don't keep pounding on l3->list_lock.
This means holding the l3->list_lock for a prolonged time period. The
existing code was done this way in order to make sure that the interrupt
3 matches
Mail list logo
