On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 03:12:42PM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> Hey Manivannan, Jakub & all,
>
> >
> > So please let us know the path forward on this series. We are open to
> > any suggestions but you haven't provided one till now.
> >
>
> I just found out that Sierra Wireless also provides
Hey Manivannan, Jakub & all,
>
> So please let us know the path forward on this series. We are open to
> any suggestions but you haven't provided one till now.
>
I just found out that Sierra Wireless also provides their own version
of mhi-net and mhi-uci in precompiled binaries for several Ubuntu
> What bothers me is maintaining shim drivers which just shuttle opaque
> messages between user space and firmware. One of which definitely is,
> and the other may well be, proprietary. This is an open source project,
> users are supposed to be able to meaningfully change the behavior of
> the syst
On Wed 10 Feb 12:41 CST 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:55:31 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:17:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > > > This may be a stupid suggestion, but
On 2/10/2021 11:41 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:55:31 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:17:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration lo
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:55:31 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:17:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > > This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration look less a
> > > backdoor if it would
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 08:17:44AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration look less a
> > backdoor if it would have been named "mhi_wwan" and it exposed already
> > all the AT+DIAG+QMI
Hey,
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration look less a
> > backdoor if it would have been named "mhi_wwan" and it exposed already
> > all the AT+DIAG+QMI+MBIM+NMEA possible channels as chardevs, not just
> > QMI
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration look less a
> backdoor if it would have been named "mhi_wwan" and it exposed already
> all the AT+DIAG+QMI+MBIM+NMEA possible channels as chardevs, not just
> QMI?
What's DIAG?
Hey Jakub
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 7:41 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:28:28 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 19:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > The current patchset only supports QMI cha
On Wed 03 Feb 12:40 CST 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:28:28 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 19:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > The current patchset only supports QMI channel so I'd
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 10:40:28AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:28:28 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 19:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > The current patchset only supports QMI chan
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:28:28 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 19:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > The current patchset only supports QMI channel so I'd request you to
> > > review the chardev node created for it.
On Wed 03 Feb 12:05 CST 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > >> Jakub, Dave, Adding you both to get your reviews on this series. I've
> > >> provided an explanation above and in the previous iteration [1].
> > >
> > >Let's be clear wha
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 19:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > >> Jakub, Dave, Adding you both to get your reviews on this series. I've
> > >> provided an explanation above and in the previous iteration [1].
> > >
> > >Let's be
On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:45:06 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> >> Jakub, Dave, Adding you both to get your reviews on this series. I've
> >> provided an explanation above and in the previous iteration [1].
> >
> >Let's be clear what the review would be for. Yet another QMI chardev
> >or the "
Hi Jakub,
On 3 February 2021 9:40:08 AM IST, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:52:08 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> > > I don't see the connection here, sorry.
>> >
>> > For instance USB_NET_CDC_MBIM driver creates the /dev/cdc-wdmX
>chardev node for
>> > configuring the modem
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:52:08 +0530 Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > I don't see the connection here, sorry.
> >
> > For instance USB_NET_CDC_MBIM driver creates the /dev/cdc-wdmX chardev node
> > for
> > configuring the modems which supports MBIM protocol over USB. Like that,
> > this
> > drive
+ Jakub, Dave
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 05:43:22PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 04:25:49PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:15:42PM +0100, Greg KH w
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 04:25:49PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:15:42PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > Hi Gr
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 04:25:49PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:15:42PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kum
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:15:42PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for UCI driver. UCI driver enables
>
On Wed 27 Jan 09:15 CST 2021, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for UCI driver. UCI driver enables
> > > userspace
> > > c
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for UCI driver. UCI driver enables userspace
> > clients to communicate to external MHI devices like modem. UCI dri
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:12:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for UCI driver. UCI
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:56:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for UCI driver. UCI driver enables userspace
> > clients to communicate to external MHI devices like mode
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:44:13AM -0800, Hemant Kumar wrote:
> This patch series adds support for UCI driver. UCI driver enables userspace
> clients to communicate to external MHI devices like modem. UCI driver probe
> creates standard character device file nodes for userspace clients to
27 matches
Mail list logo