On 09/04/18 14:05, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:47:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> +Drew, who's look at the whole save/restore thing extensively
>>
>> On 09/04/18 13:30, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:26:48PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 15/0
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:47:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +Drew, who's look at the whole save/restore thing extensively
>
> On 09/04/18 13:30, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:26:48PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 15/03/18 19:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On 15 Ma
+Drew, who's look at the whole save/restore thing extensively
On 09/04/18 13:30, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:26:48PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 15/03/18 19:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2018 at 19:00, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 06/03/18 09:21, Andrew Jon
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 07:26:48PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 15/03/18 19:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 15 March 2018 at 19:00, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 06/03/18 09:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:47:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 11:1
On 15/03/18 19:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 March 2018 at 19:00, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 06/03/18 09:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:47:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 2 March 2018 at 11:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
>
On 15 March 2018 at 19:00, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 06/03/18 09:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:47:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 2 March 2018 at 11:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
Auger Eric wrote:
> I understand the get/se
On 06/03/18 09:21, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:47:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 March 2018 at 11:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
>>> Auger Eric wrote:
I understand the get/set is called as part of the migration process.
So m
On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 10:12:42 +,
peter maydell wrote:
>
> On 6 March 2018 at 09:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 05/03/18 20:37, Auger Eric wrote:
> >> On 05/03/18 17:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> That also means that we will fail migration from a new kernel where
> >>> we've specifically asked
On 6 March 2018 at 09:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 05/03/18 20:37, Auger Eric wrote:
>> On 05/03/18 17:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> That also means that we will fail migration from a new kernel where
>>> we've specifically asked for PSCI 0.2 to an old PSCI-0.2-only kernel
>>> (because the KVM_REG_
On 05/03/18 20:37, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 05/03/18 17:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 March 2018 at 12:26, Auger Eric wrote:
>>> Hi Marc,
>>> On 02/03/18 12:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
Auger Eric wrote:
> I understand the get/set is cal
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:47:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 11:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
> > Auger Eric wrote:
> >> I understand the get/set is called as part of the migration process.
> >> So my understanding is the benefit of this ser
Hi Peter,
On 05/03/18 17:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 March 2018 at 12:26, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>> On 02/03/18 12:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
>>> Auger Eric wrote:
I understand the get/set is called as part of the migration process.
So my
On 2 March 2018 at 11:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
> Auger Eric wrote:
>> I understand the get/set is called as part of the migration process.
>> So my understanding is the benefit of this series is migration fails in
>> those cases:
>>
>> >=0.2 source -> 0.1 desti
On 2 March 2018 at 12:26, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> On 02/03/18 12:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
>> Auger Eric wrote:
>>> I understand the get/set is called as part of the migration process.
>>> So my understanding is the benefit of this series is migration fa
Hi Marc,
On 02/03/18 12:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
> Auger Eric wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 15/02/18 18:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Although we've implemented PSCI 0.1, 0.2 and 1.0, we expose either 0.1
>>> or 1.0 to a guest, defaulting to the latest version of
On Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:44:48 +,
Auger Eric wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 15/02/18 18:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Although we've implemented PSCI 0.1, 0.2 and 1.0, we expose either 0.1
> > or 1.0 to a guest, defaulting to the latest version of the PSCI
> > implementation that is compatible with t
Hi Marc,
On 15/02/18 18:58, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Although we've implemented PSCI 0.1, 0.2 and 1.0, we expose either 0.1
> or 1.0 to a guest, defaulting to the latest version of the PSCI
> implementation that is compatible with the requested version. This is
> no different from doing a firmware up
17 matches
Mail list logo
