On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:37:58PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 22:59 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Always submit patches with subject lines appropriate for the subsystem,
> > this helps get your patch noticed. People do things like search their
> > mailboxes for subsystem p
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 22:59 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:39:24PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
>
> > This is the Regulator patch for the DA9055 PMIC and has got dependency on
> > the DA9055 MFD core.
>
> Always submit patches with subject lines appropriate for the subsystem
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 03:39:24PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> This is the Regulator patch for the DA9055 PMIC and has got dependency on
> the DA9055 MFD core.
Always submit patches with subject lines appropriate for the subsystem,
this helps get your patch noticed. People do things like searc
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:32:25PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> Does this patch looks good for you?
Don't top post and don't send contentless pings. I've not yet read the
patch and as previously explained nagging like this just means things
take longer; you'd achieve more with basic stuff like u
Does this patch looks good for you?
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 15:39 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> This is the Regulator patch for the DA9055 PMIC and has got dependency on
> the DA9055 MFD core.
>
> This patch support all of the DA9055 regulators. The output voltages are
> fully programmable through I
Recalling this post. Wrong patch version got included.
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 12:06 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> This is the Regulator patch for the DA9055 PMIC and has got dependency on
> the DA9055 MFD core.
>
> This patch support all of the DA9055 regulators. The output voltages are
> fully pro
6 matches
Mail list logo
