On 09/17/2017 10:08 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
...
+
+extern struct static_key_false __sev;
+static inline bool __sev_active(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&__sev);
+}
I'm still not happy about the two's sev_active() and __sev_active()
naming. Perhaps the __ variant should be
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky
>
> Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) does not support string I/O, so
> unroll the string I/O operation into a loop operating on one element at
> a time.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: "H.
2 matches
Mail list logo
