Rusty Russell writes:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>> So this feels wrong to me, can you guys please explain:
...
>> I didn't actually pull the tree, I just reacted to the pull request itself.
...
> I can pull them out of modules-next if you'd prefer.
OK, removed that patch. Here's the update pullr
Linus Torvalds writes:
> So this feels wrong to me, can you guys please explain:
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> Ben Hutchings (3):
>> module: Invalidate signatures on force-loaded modules
>> module: Disable MODULE_FORCE_LOAD when MODULE_SIG_FORCE is en
On Sun, 2016-07-31 at 21:44 -0400, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this feels wrong to me, can you guys please explain:
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > Ben Hutchings (3):
> > module: Invalidate signatures on force-loaded modules
> > module: Disable MODULE
So this feels wrong to me, can you guys please explain:
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> Ben Hutchings (3):
> module: Invalidate signatures on force-loaded modules
> module: Disable MODULE_FORCE_LOAD when MODULE_SIG_FORCE is enabled
forcing a load and SIG_FOR
Linus Torvalds writes:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> The exciting thing here is the getting rid of stop_machine on module
>> removal. This is possible by using a simple atomic_t for the counter,
>> rather than our fancy per-cpu counter: it turns out that no one is
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> The exciting thing here is the getting rid of stop_machine on module
> removal. This is possible by using a simple atomic_t for the counter,
> rather than our fancy per-cpu counter: it turns out that no one is doing
> a module increment pe
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:33:20AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> So, did you queue a patch to fix your email address in
>> drivers/regulator/virtual.c?
>
> No, that's more about giving credit to Wolfson for funding the code I
> guess
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:33:20AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> So, did you queue a patch to fix your email address in
> drivers/regulator/virtual.c?
No, that's more about giving credit to Wolfson for funding the code I
guess - it's very rare for anyone to update the author information (and
beco
Mark Brown writes:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:55:00AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Mark Brown writes:
>
>> > if you need to respin - please do send patches to maintainers.
>
>> If the address in drivers/regulator/virtual.c is incorrect, please
>> update it:
>
>> Subject: [PATCH 5/9] drivers/
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:55:00AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > if you need to respin - please do send patches to maintainers.
> If the address in drivers/regulator/virtual.c is incorrect, please
> update it:
> Subject: [PATCH 5/9] drivers/regulator/virtual: avoid world
Mark Brown writes:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 03:03:47PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> drivers/regulator/virtual: avoid world-writable sysfs files.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown
>
> if you need to respin - please do send patches to maintainers.
If the address in drivers/regulator/virtual.c is
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 03:03:47PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> drivers/regulator/virtual: avoid world-writable sysfs files.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
if you need to respin - please do send patches to maintainers.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
