On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 10:11 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/24/2013 04:36 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> > Which version of 3.2-rt was this applied to. It does not apply, where
> > patch 7/16 totally does not apply. I looked at the history of 3.2-rt
On 04/24/2013 04:36 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Steven,
> Which version of 3.2-rt was this applied to. It does not apply, where
> patch 7/16 totally does not apply. I looked at the history of 3.2-rt and
> I can't find where it would apply.
I applied them on top of 2438ee33 ("Lin
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features
> from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation.
>
> SLUB has a way better performance than SLAB on RT and the split
> softirq lock implement
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 23:06 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 09:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>
> > Oh ignore me. Just saw the patchset for 3.4-rt.
>
> Note, I already have part of the 3.4-feature (softirq backport) tested
> and ready. What I'm waiting on is trying to figure out
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 09:56 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Oh ignore me. Just saw the patchset for 3.4-rt.
Note, I already have part of the 3.4-feature (softirq backport) tested
and ready. What I'm waiting on is trying to figure out the best way to
process it.
I already know I'll have a v3.4-features
On 2013/2/19 9:54, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/2/14 1:24, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features
>>> from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation.
>>>
>>>
On 2013/2/14 1:24, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features
>> from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation.
>>
>> SLUB has a way better performance than SLA
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features
> > from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation.
> >
> > SLUB has a way better performance
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 3.2-rt is a long term supported kernel, which lacks two RT features
> from 3.6: SLUB support and the split softirq lock implementation.
>
> SLUB has a way better performance than SLAB on RT and the split
> softirq lock implement
9 matches
Mail list logo
