On 5/2/14, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:51PM +0530, Raghavendra KT wrote:
[...]
>> Because all the way along, though we have freedom to make the cpusets
>> exclusive and move tasks (say VMs) into them,
>> making sure they do not interfere with each other, we can not
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:51PM +0530, Raghavendra KT wrote:
> For some controllers like cpuset, when we have exclusive_cpu is set,
> what about having a knob in the cpuset controller
> to move the task to non-root (when option is set).
I'm doubtful.
> Because all the way along, though
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> How does this work for root's tasks now? Given that task can only be
>> in leaf cgroups, that means tasks can't be in / cgroup (If one wants
>> to create some cgroups). Does that mean / will be empty and init system
>> need to setup things righ
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:58:24AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> I know we should allow multiple hierarchies, but why we allow this even
> if sane_behavior is specified?
Oh, because we didn't have unified hierarchy before. The whole
sane_behavior thing is gonna go away. It'll be absorbed into
on 2014/4/15 3:21, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> So is this an intermediate mode before we move to single hiearchy *only*
>> mode. AFAIK, you had mentioned that we will support legacy multiple
>> hiearchy mode but single hiearchy is t
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:40:49PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> The patchset is on top of cgroup/for-3.15 01a971406177 ("cgroup: Use
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(x, NULL) in cgroup.c") and also available in the
> following git branch.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git review-unif
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> So is this an intermediate mode before we move to single hiearchy *only*
> mode. AFAIK, you had mentioned that we will support legacy multiple
> hiearchy mode but single hiearchy is the new default mode.
Hmmm? It's a separate
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:52:36PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > So this patchset does not *enforce* a single hierarchy? So user space
> > can still mount other hierarchies.
>
> Nope, nothing is forced. Controllers may be mo
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:45:56AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> So this patchset does not *enforce* a single hierarchy? So user space
> can still mount other hierarchies.
Nope, nothing is forced. Controllers may be moved between unified and
traditional multiple hierarchies.
> How does thi
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:40:49PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
[..]
> This patchset finally implements the default unified hierarchy. The
> goal is providing enough flexibility while enforcing stricter common
> structure where appropriate to address the above listed issues.
>
> Controllers which are
10 matches
Mail list logo
