Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

2016-11-21 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Arnaldo, Could you please take a look at this? Thanks, Namhyung On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist comm

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

2016-11-21 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Jiri, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:34:28PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > > tim

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

2016-11-16 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:06:26PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy > these days, s

Re: [PATCHSET 0/7] perf sched: Introduce timehist command, again (v2)

2016-11-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This patchset is a rebased version of David's sched timehist work [1]. > I plan to improve perf sched command more and think that having > timehist command before the work looks good. It seems David is busy > these days, so I'm retrying it by myself. > > *