Em Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:11:01AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni escreveu:
> Hi perf maintainers,
>
> can this be queued to -next??
> please let me know, if have to rebase to any specific branch and send
> next version?
I went over the messages and saw the acks, will try and process it now.
Sorry f
Hi perf maintainers,
can this be queued to -next??
please let me know, if have to rebase to any specific branch and send
next version?
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 3:34 PM, John Garry wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 01:23, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02:17AM +0530, G
On 07/11/2017 01:23, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02:17AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
Extending json/jevent framework for parsing arm64 event files.
Adding jevents for ThunderX2 implementation defined PMU events.
v9:
- Rebased to [3] and resolved conficts
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02:17AM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Extending json/jevent framework for parsing arm64 event files.
> Adding jevents for ThunderX2 implementation defined PMU events.
>
> v9:
>- Rebased to [3] and resolved conficts in PATCH 1/5 and reworked PATCH 3
On 18/10/2017 18:49, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
Hi Arnaldo, Will,
can this be queued to next?
Is there any update on the status of this patchset? From searching the
acme git, I can only assume that it has not been merged. So we'll have
to work on top of this out-of-tree series.
John
On
Hi Arnaldo, Will,
can this be queued to next?
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
wrote:
> Extending json/jevent framework for parsing arm64 event files.
> Adding jevents for ThunderX2 implementation defined PMU events.
>
> v9:
>- Rebased to [3] and resolved conficts in PAT
6 matches
Mail list logo
