Re: [PATCH v9] Cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition

2013-06-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, June 24, 2013 02:04:50 PM Xiaoguang Chen wrote: > Hi, Rafael > When can this patch be merged? Well, it's in my bleeding-edge branch. If it doesn't break builds, it will go to linux-next for 3.11. Thanks, Rafael > 2013/6/19 Xiaoguang Chen : > > On 06/19/2013 03:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wr

Re: [PATCH v9] Cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition

2013-06-23 Thread Xiaoguang Chen
Hi, Rafael When can this patch be merged? 2013/6/19 Xiaoguang Chen : > On 06/19/2013 03:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> >> On 19 June 2013 12:30, Xiaoguang Chen wrote: >>> >>> Cpufreq governor's stop and start operation should be kept in sequence. >>> If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for

Re: [PATCH v9] Cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition

2013-06-19 Thread Xiaoguang Chen
On 06/19/2013 03:55 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: On 19 June 2013 12:30, Xiaoguang Chen wrote: Cpufreq governor's stop and start operation should be kept in sequence. If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example: There are 4 CPUs and policy->cpu=CPU0, CPU1/2/3 are linked to CPU0. The norma

Re: [PATCH v9] Cpufreq: Fix governor start/stop race condition

2013-06-19 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 19 June 2013 12:30, Xiaoguang Chen wrote: > Cpufreq governor's stop and start operation should be kept in sequence. > If not, there will be unexpected behavior, for example: > > There are 4 CPUs and policy->cpu=CPU0, CPU1/2/3 are linked to CPU0. > The normal sequence is as below: > > 1) Current