On Mon, 15 May 2017, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 May 2017 05:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 May 2017, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Update the cpumask with the target cpu and
> > > + * migrate the context if needed
> > > + */
> > > + if (target >= 0 &&
Sorry for delayed response.
On Wednesday 10 May 2017 05:39 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
+/*
+ * nest_init : Initializes the nest imc engine for the current chip.
+ * by default the nest engine is disabled.
+ */
+static void nest_init(int *cpu_opal_rc)
+
On Friday 12 May 2017 09:03 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Stewart Smith writes:
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
* in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this
On Friday 12 May 2017 07:48 AM, Stewart Smith wrote:
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
* in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this in a later patch anyway?)
S
Stewart Smith writes:
> Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
>>> * in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
>>>than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
>>>OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this in a later patch anyway?)
>>
>> So, init call will
Madhavan Srinivasan writes:
>> * in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return something other
>>than OPAL_SUCCESS in the case on invalid arguments? Maybe
>>OPAL_PARAMETER? (I think you fix this in a later patch anyway?)
>
> So, init call will return OPAL_PARAMETER for the u
On Thu, 11 May 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 10 May 2017 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
> wrote:
> >
> > > +static void nest_change_cpu_context(int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
> > > +{
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0;
> > > + (per_nest_pmu_arr[i] != NULL) && (i
Hi,
On Wed, 10 May 2017 14:09:53 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner
wrote:
>
> > +static void nest_change_cpu_context(int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0;
> > +(per_nest_pmu_arr[i] != NULL) && (i < IMC_MAX_PMUS); i++)
> > + perf_pmu_migrate_contex
On Thu, 4 May 2017, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
> +/*
> + * nest_init : Initializes the nest imc engine for the current chip.
> + * by default the nest engine is disabled.
> + */
> +static void nest_init(int *cpu_opal_rc)
> +{
> + int rc;
> +
> + /*
> + * OPAL figures out which CPU to start
Hi Daniel,
On Monday 08 May 2017 07:42 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a look at the API as it was a big thing I didn't like in the
earlier version.
I am much happier with this one.
Some comments:
- I'm no longer subscribed to skiboot but I've had a look at the
patches on th
On Monday 08 May 2017 07:42 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Hi all,
I've had a look at the API as it was a big thing I didn't like in the
earlier version.
I am much happier with this one.
Thanks to mpe for suggesting this. :)
Some comments:
- I'm no longer subscribed to skiboot but I've had
Hi all,
I've had a look at the API as it was a big thing I didn't like in the
earlier version.
I am much happier with this one.
Some comments:
- I'm no longer subscribed to skiboot but I've had a look at the
patches on that side:
* in patch 9 should opal_imc_counters_init return someth
12 matches
Mail list logo
