Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support

2013-09-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
That is some important piece of information that might be useful for others and so cc'ing LKML and other lists.. On 11 September 2013 01:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 02:16:03 PM Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> For my curiosity - what is the difference between bleeding-e

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support

2013-08-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27 August 2013 14:15, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > For my future work it is important, to "stabilize" those patches at > some kernel_pm branch (linux-next or other). You can rebase them over 3.12-rc1 as soon as it is released after few weeks and then Rafael can get them into linux-next. -- To unsu

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support

2013-08-27 Thread Lukasz Majewski
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:10:42 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote, > On 26 August 2013 21:20, Lukasz Majewski > wrote: > > This patch series introduces support for CPU overclocking technique > > called Boost. > > > > It is a follow up of a LAB governor proposal. Boost is a LAB > > comp

Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] cpufreq:boost: CPU Boost mode support

2013-08-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 26 August 2013 21:20, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > This patch series introduces support for CPU overclocking technique > called Boost. > > It is a follow up of a LAB governor proposal. Boost is a LAB component: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1484746/match=cpufreq > > Boost unifies har