>
> Here it is, you're initializing 'prefix' here although it is being
> used in the previous patch. You should concentrate the whole prefix
> initialization and passing in one patch so that there are no breakages.
Yes I probably could have broken up the patches in a cleaner way. Thanks.
>
> A
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:03:18PM -0700, Lance Ortiz wrote:
> These changes make cper_print_aer more consistent with aer_print_error
> which is called in the AER interrupt case. The string in the variable
> 'prefix' is printed at the beginning of each print statement in
> cper_print_aer(). The pre
Em Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:03:18 -0700
Lance Ortiz escreveu:
Hmm... I did a reply to v6 of this patch, but i pressed the wrong button
and it went only to Joe. Excuse-me for that. Let me resend the
comments to everybody:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 16:33 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 04 Dec
3 matches
Mail list logo