* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:03:55PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > >> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
> > >> interface and correspond
Em Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:03:55PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
> >> interface and corresponding user level tool, perf.
> > Ok, so I have c
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
>> interface and corresponding user level tool, perf.
>
> Ok, so I have created a topic tree for this, tip:perf/x86.
>
> I have applied the kernel
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
>> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
>> interface and corresponding user level tool, perf.
>
> Can I add your Signed-off-by tag to the patches you picked up
> from Andi?
>
Yes. But note
* Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
> interface and corresponding user level tool, perf.
Ok, so I have created a topic tree for this, tip:perf/x86.
I have applied the kernel bits (with some minor renaming
changes). Arnaldo, if you agree w
* Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch series had a new feature to the kernel perf_events
> interface and corresponding user level tool, perf.
Can I add your Signed-off-by tag to the patches you picked up
from Andi?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
6 matches
Mail list logo