On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> I am coming again with this series, hoping this is a better time for you all
> to
> look at it.
>
> I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it
> deserves a special discussion (even though my position i
On 06/06/2013 05:49 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I generally agree with the approach but which tree is it based on?
> Can you please let me know the base commit so that I can review the
> series properly?
last week's -tip/master
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
Hello, Glauber.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it
> deserves a special discussion (even though my position in this matter is
> widely
> known), but all the infrastructure to make it happen is
3 matches
Mail list logo
