On (02/20/19 10:24), Petr Mladek wrote:
> Well, better be on the safe side. I'll move it at the beginning
> of the patchset.
>
> PS: I am a bit busy with some other things. I'll send v7 later.
If this is the only change you are going to make then I'm OK with v6.
-ss
On Tue 2019-02-19 13:06:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:07 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
> wrote:
>
> > Suppose, in my driver I want to sprintf() IPv4 address. The longest
> > possible address is 3 * 4 (%d%d%d) + 3 bytes (dots) + terminating NULL.
> > E.g. 111.111.111.111
> >
> > f
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:07 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
wrote:
> Suppose, in my driver I want to sprintf() IPv4 address. The longest
> possible address is 3 * 4 (%d%d%d) + 3 bytes (dots) + terminating NULL.
> E.g. 111.111.111.111
>
> So I can allocate a 16-bytes buffer (stack or slab) and accidentally
On (02/08/19 16:23), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> Plain Pointers
> --
> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> index 3a95b4d1ca2e..e51cbc2be540 100644
> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> @@ -1510,7 +1510,7 @@ char *ip_addr_string(char *buf, char *end, const void
> *p
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:42:56AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2019-02-13 15:54:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2019-02-08 19:27:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:23:10PM +0100, Petr Mladek w
On Wed 2019-02-13 15:54:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2019-02-08 19:27:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:23:10PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > We are able to detect invalid values handled by %p[iI]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2019-02-08 19:27:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:23:10PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > We are able to detect invalid values handled by %p[iI] printk specifier.
> > > The current error message is "inval
On Fri 2019-02-08 19:27:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:23:10PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > We are able to detect invalid values handled by %p[iI] printk specifier.
> > The current error message is "invalid address". It might cause confusion
> > against "(efault)" reported
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:23:10PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> We are able to detect invalid values handled by %p[iI] printk specifier.
> The current error message is "invalid address". It might cause confusion
> against "(efault)" reported by the generic valid_pointer_address() check.
>
> Let's u
9 matches
Mail list logo
