On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 07:50:13PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:42:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:53:33PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:41:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > Loc
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:42:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:53:33PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:41:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Lockdep complains about recursive deadlock of zram->init_lock.
> > > [1] made it fa
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:53:33PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:41:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Lockdep complains about recursive deadlock of zram->init_lock.
> > [1] made it false positive because we can't request IO to zram
> > before setting disks
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:41:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Lockdep complains about recursive deadlock of zram->init_lock.
> [1] made it false positive because we can't request IO to zram
> before setting disksize. Anyway, we should shut lockdep up to
> avoid many reporting from user.
>
> [1] :
4 matches
Mail list logo