Thanks.
Applied the whole series to dma-mapping for-next.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 07:58:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:07:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > I have no objection for you just taking this whole series as-is, no need
> > to worry about merge conflicts with the USB tree, I doubt anything will
> > be touching this
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:07:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> I have no objection for you just taking this whole series as-is, no need
> to worry about merge conflicts with the USB tree, I doubt anything will
> be touching this area of code anytime soon.
>
> So if you want to take it now, feel free t
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:07:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> I have no objection for you just taking this whole series as-is, no need
> to worry about merge conflicts with the USB tree, I doubt anything will
> be touching this area of code anytime soon.
>
> So if you want to take it now, feel free t
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 08:56:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As we seem to be getting ready to merge this series: can the usb
> maintainers please commit it to an immutable branch that I can pull
> into the dma-mapping tree? These changes are a preparation for
> reworking the per-device D
As we seem to be getting ready to merge this series: can the usb
maintainers please commit it to an immutable branch that I can pull
into the dma-mapping tree? These changes are a preparation for
reworking the per-device DMA coherent allocator, and I'd prefer not
to wait for the next merge window
6 matches
Mail list logo
