Hello Wolfram,
On 11/05/2017 10:53 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:49:48PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
>> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
>> I2C de
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:49:48PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID a
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
>> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
>> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
>> + },
>
> checkpatch reported this one as u
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
>> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
>> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
>> + },
>
> checkpatch reported this one
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 04:43:14PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> + {
> >> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
> >> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> >> + AT24_FLAG_REA
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
>> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
>> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
>> + },
>
> checkpatch reported this one as un
Hi,
> + {
> + .compatible = "atmel,spd",
> + .data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> + AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
> + },
checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
since this is solely for EE
7 matches
Mail list logo