On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:23:55PM +0100, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:42:11AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> > On Monday 04 February 2013 08:02 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:06:47AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> > >> On Friday 01 Febr
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:42:11AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Monday 04 February 2013 08:02 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:06:47AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> >> On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >>> -static int
On Monday 04 February 2013 08:02 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:06:47AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
...
-static int clk_pll_wait_for_lock(struct tegra_clk_pll *pll,
-voi
On 02/01/2013 03:18 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Refactor the PLL programming code to make it useable by the new PLL types
> introduced by Tegra114.
I tested this series on Tegra20 and Tegra30 for regressions and found
none. Note that I didn't test on Tegra114. The series,
Tested-by: Stephen W
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 07:06:47AM +0100, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
...
> >
> > -static int clk_pll_wait_for_lock(struct tegra_clk_pll *pll,
> > -void __iomem *lock_addr, u32 lock_bit_idx)
> > +static i
On Friday 01 February 2013 03:48 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
Refactor the PLL programming code to make it useable by the new PLL types
introduced by Tegra114.
The following changes were done:
* Split programming the PLL into updating m,n,p and updating cpcon
* Move locking from _update_pll_cp
6 matches
Mail list logo