Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()

2015-12-23 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (12/22/15 07:23), Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:59:36PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Cc stable > > > > Do I need to resend the patch or providing the message-id is enough? > > > > > > lkml.kernel.org/r/1448973390-21170-3-git-send-email-sergey.senozhat...

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()

2015-12-22 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:59:36PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello, > > Cc stable > > Do I need to resend the patch or providing the message-id is enough? > > > lkml.kernel.org/r/1448973390-21170-3-git-send-email-sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com > ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=1448

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()

2015-12-21 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
Hello, Cc stable Do I need to resend the patch or providing the message-id is enough? lkml.kernel.org/r/1448973390-21170-3-git-send-email-sergey.senozhat...@gmail.com ( http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144897350818887 ) -ss > From: Kyeongdon Kim > > When we're using LZ4 multi com

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()

2015-12-21 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (12/22/15 12:10), Kyeongdon Kim wrote: [..] > > Hello Kyeongdon, > > > > just to make sure, the patch works fine for you and we can move > > forward and Cc -stable. correct? > > > > -ss > > > Hello Sergey, > > I was on vacation so I checked your email a moment ago, sorry about it. > We're us

Re: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()

2015-12-21 Thread Kyeongdon Kim
On 2015-12-18 오전 9:28, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (12/01/15 21:36), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> When we're using LZ4 multi compression streams for zram swap, we found > out >> page allocation failure message in system running test. That was not only >> once, but a few(2 - 5 times per test). A

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] zram: try vmalloc() after kmalloc()

2015-12-17 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (12/01/15 21:36), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > When we're using LZ4 multi compression streams for zram swap, we found out > page allocation failure message in system running test. That was not only > once, but a few(2 - 5 times per test). Also, some failure cases were > continually occurring to