On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Alexandre Belloni
wrote:
> On 28/02/2014 at 08:26:46 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote :
>>
>> What is the state of the series? Who is now responsible for the
>> patches? What issues were still not handled?
>>
>
> We probably want to end that discussion before taking th
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 14:29 +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 08:26 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This patch series adds device tree support to the wlcore_sdio driver,
> > > which is used by WiLink6, Wi
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 08:26 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series adds device tree support to the wlcore_sdio driver,
> > which is used by WiLink6, WiLink7 and WiLink8.
> >
> > The first patches do some clean-up to m
On 28/02/2014 at 08:26:46 +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote :
>
> What is the state of the series? Who is now responsible for the
> patches? What issues were still not handled?
>
We probably want to end that discussion before taking those bindings in:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-ker
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series adds device tree support to the wlcore_sdio driver,
> which is used by WiLink6, WiLink7 and WiLink8.
>
> The first patches do some clean-up to make the data needed in the
> wilink device tree node smaller. The rema
5 matches
Mail list logo