Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] selftests/lam: get_user additions and LAM enabled check

2024-11-27 Thread Maciej Wieczor-Retman
On 2024-11-26 at 09:34:36 -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: >On 11/26/24 06:34, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: >> Recent change in how get_user() handles pointers [1] has a specific case >> for LAM. It assigns a different bitmask that's later used to check >> whether a pointer comes from userland in get_user(

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] selftests/lam: get_user additions and LAM enabled check

2024-11-27 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:34:47PM +0100, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: > Recent change in how get_user() handles pointers [1] has a specific case > for LAM. It assigns a different bitmask that's later used to check > whether a pointer comes from userland in get_user(). > > While currently commente

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] selftests/lam: get_user additions and LAM enabled check

2024-11-26 Thread Shuah Khan
On 11/26/24 06:34, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote: Recent change in how get_user() handles pointers [1] has a specific case for LAM. It assigns a different bitmask that's later used to check whether a pointer comes from userland in get_user(). While currently commented out (until LASS [2] is merged