On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:54:47PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote:
> On 2019-04-09 15:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> What's the status of this patch now? It's needed in linux-5.0.y as TPM
> >> 2.0 support is currently b
On 2019-04-24 02:43, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:54:47PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote:
>> On 2019-04-09 15:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote:
[...]
What's the status of this patch now? It's needed in linux-5
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:54:47PM +0200, Jonas Witschel wrote:
On 2019-04-09 15:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote:
[...]
What's the status of this patch now? It's needed in linux-5.0.y as TPM
2.0 support is currently broken with those
On 2019-04-09 15:44, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote:
>> [...]
>> What's the status of this patch now? It's needed in linux-5.0.y as TPM
>> 2.0 support is currently broken with those stable kernels without this
>> commit.
>
> part of a PR.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote:
> Hello Jarkko,
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> > On 3/28/19 5:34 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Thank you, it is applied.
> >
> > Thank you Jarkko.
>
> What's the status of this patch now?
Hello Jarkko,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:34:18AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 3/28/19 5:34 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Thank you, it is applied.
>
> Thank you Jarkko.
What's the status of this patch now? It's needed in linux-5.0.y as TPM
2.0 support is currently broken with those stable k
On 3/28/19 5:34 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Thank you, it is applied.
Thank you Jarkko.
--
Tadeusz
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:32:38AM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> The poll condition should only check response_length,
> because reads should only be issued if there is data to read.
> The response_read flag only prevents double writes.
> The problem was that the write set the response_read to fals
8 matches
Mail list logo