On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:05:13PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +/**
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_set_attribute - handler for %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION
> + * @filep: open file to /dev/sgx
> + * @arg: userspace pointer to a struct sgx_enclave_provision instance
> + *
> + * Mark the enclave as bei
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:26:38AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> BTW, probably would make sense to rewrite the short summary as:
>
> "x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION"
>
> for the sake of consistency with the three precursoring patches.
Ok.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://p
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 09:41:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:27:06PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 'sgx_dev_enclave' is successfully register whenever that happens. Am I
> > missing something here?
>
> No, I was missing the fact that you have *two* misc devices
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:27:06PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 'sgx_dev_enclave' is successfully register whenever that happens. Am I
> missing something here?
No, I was missing the fact that you have *two* misc devices and you're
deregistering the first one in the error path of the second.
F
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 08:07:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:28:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > @@ -181,5 +192,12 @@ int __init sgx_drv_init(void)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = misc_register(&sgx_dev_provision);
> > + if (ret) {
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:28:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> @@ -181,5 +192,12 @@ int __init sgx_drv_init(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = misc_register(&sgx_dev_provision);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Creating /dev/sgx/provision failed with %d.\n",
6 matches
Mail list logo
