On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:25:20PM -0700, Frank S Filz wrote:
>
> "J. Bruce Fields" wrote
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:08:44PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:36:38 -0400
> > > "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
> > > > > It doesn't look like this patch removes any of that old co
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:08:44PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:36:38 -0400
> "J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:05:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > knfsd has some code already to handle share reservations internally.
> > > Nothing outside of knfsd
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:36:38 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:05:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > knfsd has some code already to handle share reservations internally.
> > Nothing outside of knfsd is aware of these reservations, of course so
> > moving to a vfs-level o
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:05:40PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> knfsd has some code already to handle share reservations internally.
> Nothing outside of knfsd is aware of these reservations, of course so
> moving to a vfs-level object for it would be a marked improvement.
>
> It doesn't look like
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 19:25:33 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
> that maps them into O_DENY flags and make them visible for
> applications that use O_DENYMAND opens.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky
> ---
> fs/locks.c | 1 +
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 46 +++
5 matches
Mail list logo