On Wed, 26 Mar, at 01:46:17PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar, at 01:31:04PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 26.03.14 at 14:12, wrote:
> > >
> > > Is there a reason that you can't just populate an efi_system_table_t
> > > object, which could be used by efi_init(), so that we can save you the
On Wed, 26 Mar, at 01:31:04PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.03.14 at 14:12, wrote:
> >
> > Is there a reason that you can't just populate an efi_system_table_t
> > object, which could be used by efi_init(), so that we can save you the
> > trouble of duplicating all of this code?
>
> Would the
>>> On 26.03.14 at 14:12, wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar, at 09:57:56PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> +static void __init efi_init_xen(void)
>> +{
>> +efi_char16_t vendor_c16[100];
>> +char vendor[ARRAY_SIZE(vendor_c16)];
>> +int ret, i;
>> +struct xen_platform_op op;
>> +union xenpf_efi_in
On Tue, 25 Mar, at 09:57:56PM, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Put EFI machinery for Xen in place.
>
> This patch is based on Jan Beulich and Tang Liang work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper
> Signed-off-by: Tang Liang
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++
> drivers/x
4 matches
Mail list logo